-
Coordinate A Play Date
Discussion Post: My Community Challenge
In this discussion, create a post that explains how you would plan, organize, and facilitate a Stakeholder’s Dilemma Play Date to address a specific community issue.
Instructions
- Identify the Community Challenge – Describe a real issue affecting your community and explain why it would make a strong Stakeholder’s Dilemma Play Date challenge. Who are the key stakeholders involved?
- Plan Your Play Date – Outline how you would structure the Play Date, including:
- The goal of the session
- Who would be invited to participate (stakeholders, community members, students, etc.)
- How you would introduce the challenge and engage participants
Use your Future Ready Skill Card Collection to Guide the Session – Select at least three Community On Demand Skill Cards that participants would use during the Play Date to develop solutions. Explain how these skills will help tackle financial sustainability, workforce readiness, and customer engagement.- Facilitate Collaboration & Decision-Making – Describe how you would encourage teamwork, discussion, and problem-solving during the Play Date. How would participants weigh the pros and cons of their solutions?
- Next Steps & Implementation – Conclude by explaining how the Play Date outcomes would be used to create an action plan. How will the solutions be implemented in the community?
Engagement Requirements
- Post your response outlining your Play Date setup.
- Comment on at least two classmates’ posts by offering feedback, asking questions, or suggesting additional strategies to improve their Play Date plan.
Deliverable
- Submit a 1-3 page Play Date Plan detailing your approach to organizing and facilitating the session. Use the example outline, questions and tips below to think through the design of your session. Be creative and make sure your participants have fun!
Â
THE STAKEHOLDER’S DILEMMA PLAY DATE
THIRD THURSDAY, THIS MONTH
LOCAL COMMUNITY CENTER
7:00PM – 9:00PM
Our Mission
Use the Stakeholder’s Dilemma Canvas to determine if we should approve the proposal for build a new potato chip factory in our community.
Our Goal
Consolidate our feedback into one Stakeholder’s Dilemma Canvas so we can develop and present our strategic solutions as a collective.
SESSION AGENDA
Arrival & Onboarding (30 Minutes Prior To Start)
- Check-In & Networking
- Stakeholders introduce themselves and share their connection to the dilemma.
- Overview of The Stakeholder’s Dilemma
- Facilitator explains the game objectives, the Stakeholder’s Dilemma Canvas, and the importance of collaboration.
- Setting the Stage
- Stakeholders select their roles and community challenge focus.
- Each participant receives a Stakeholder’s Dilemma Canvas and supporting worksheets.
Â
0:00 – 0:10 | Welcome & Introductions
- Brief overview of The Stakeholder’s Dilemma Canvas Model and its purpose.
- Participants introduce themselves and share their perspective on the proposed potato chip factory.
- Explanation of session flow and expected outcomes.
0:10 – 0:30 | Phase 1: Understanding the Challenge
- Identify Key Metrics & Social ROI (Socio-Economic Conditions) (10 min)
- Discussion: What are the key social, economic, and environmental conditions affecting the community in relation to the proposed factory?
- Activity: Participants list key metrics that define the potential impact of the new facility.
- Outcome: A shared understanding of the issue’s broad impact.
- Feedback Loop: Stakeholders note key insights and potential missing data for further research.
- Identify the Problem & Relevant Stakeholders (10 min)
- Discussion: What are the core benefits and risks of allowing the factory? Who are the key stakeholders?
- Activity: Stakeholders map out individuals, businesses, organizations, and influencers affected by or involved in the decision.
- Outcome: Clear problem definition and identification of decision-makers.
- Feedback Loop: Participants document additional community partners that could help address the issue.
0:30 – 1:00 | Phase 2: Strategic Analysis & Planning
- Weigh the Pros & Cons (Using the STEAM Investigative Process) (10 min)
- Discussion: What are the potential benefits, risks, and long-term effects of approving or denying the factory?
- Activity: Participants list pros and cons of different approaches.
- Outcome: Informed decision-making framework for the best solutions.
- Feedback Loop: Identify knowledge gaps that require additional research.
- Define Roles & Value Proposition (10 min)
- Discussion: What role does each stakeholder play in the decision? What resources do they bring?
- Activity: Stakeholders align their skills and expertise with specific aspects of the solution.
- Outcome: Defined contributions for each participant.
- Feedback Loop: Record key skills needed but currently missing from the group.
- Collaboratively Develop a Strategy (10 min)
- Discussion: How can multiple perspectives be integrated into a decision that balances economic growth and community well-being?
- Activity: Teams draft a strategic action plan using critical thinking and negotiation.
- Outcome: A collaborative, well-rounded approach to evaluating the factory’s potential impact.
- Feedback Loop: Participants suggest refinements to enhance the plan.
1:00 – 1:30 | Phase 3: Solution Development & Justification
- Present Your Argument (Budget & Justification) (10 min)
- Discussion: What financial, social, and logistical considerations must be made?
- Activity: Participants align financial, environmental, and social justifications for their stance.
- Outcome: A structured argument supporting or opposing the factory proposal.
- Feedback Loop: Capture concerns and additional funding or regulatory opportunities.
- Create an Implementation Plan (10 min)
- Discussion: If approved, what steps need to be taken for execution? If denied, what alternatives should be explored?
- Activity: Teams create a roadmap with assigned responsibilities, timelines, and resources.
- Outcome: A clear step-by-step implementation or alternative plan.
- Feedback Loop: Identify possible bottlenecks and mitigation strategies.
- Convert Solutions into Pre-Apprenticeships & Job Opportunities (10 min)
- Discussion: How can this initiative lead to workforce and economic development?
- Activity: Stakeholders brainstorm potential roles and training programs related to the facility or alternative job creation strategies.
- Outcome: A workforce development component integrated into the plan.
- Feedback Loop: Document next steps to engage workforce development organizations.
1:30 – 1:50 | Phase 4: Measuring & Presenting Impact
- Map Out Key Metrics & Social ROI (Measurable Outcomes) (10 min)
- Discussion: What success indicators will measure the impact of either approving or denying the facility?
- Activity: Participants define quantifiable outcomes (job creation, environmental impact, economic benefits, public health concerns).
- Outcome: A measurable impact assessment framework.
- Feedback Loop: Adjust metrics based on stakeholder input.
- Present the Final Solution & Expected Impact (10 min)
- Discussion: How will this decision create a lasting impact on the community?
- Activity: Teams deliver a concise final presentation summarizing their stance and recommendations.
- Outcome: A polished proposal ready for stakeholder review and decision-making.
- Feedback Loop: Stakeholders provide final insights and identify implementation partners.
1:50 – 2:00 | Wrap-Up & Next Steps
- Reflection on key takeaways from the session.
- What challenges did stakeholders face?
- What were the most valuable insights?
- How will they apply this process moving forward?
- How will they implement their solution as a service-learning project?
- Final Networking & Action Steps: Discussion on how stakeholders can continue collaboration
- Share next steps for real-world application of solutions.
- Connect with key stakeholders for potential funding, partnerships, and implementation.
- Invitation for follow-up meetings and resource sharing.
- Feedback Loop: Collect participant feedback on session effectiveness.
Key Takeaways
- Participants will leave with a comprehensive strategy to address the potential impact of the potato chip factory.
- Stakeholders will have a structured implementation plan with measurable goals.
- The session fosters collaboration, innovation, and practical solutions that lead to real impact.
Wrap-Up & Reflection (30 Minutes)
- Group Discussion
- What challenges did stakeholders face?
- What were the most valuable insights?
- How will they apply this process moving forward?
- How will they implement their solution as a service-learning project?
- Final Networking & Action Steps
- Share next steps for real-world application of solutions.
- Connect with key stakeholders for potential funding, partnerships, and implementation.
-
0 Replies
Sorry, there were no replies found.
Log in to reply.